Keep People in Their Homes. Protect Family Farms. Cut the Burden. Hold Government Accountable.

Property taxes have become one of the most unfair burdens placed on Pennsylvania families.

​

People work their whole lives to buy a home, pay the mortgage, maintain the property, and pay taxes at every level. Then every year, government comes back and says they owe more just to stay in the home they already own.

​

That is wrong.

​

No Pennsylvanian should live in fear of losing their home, farm, or small business because government cannot control spending.

​

No senior should be taxed out of the house they spent decades paying for.

​

No family farm should be broken apart because the next generation cannot afford the tax bill.

​

No renter should be ignored just because the tax bill is sent to the landlord.

​

No small business should be crushed by property taxes hidden inside rent, leases, or commercial pass-through charges.

​

Pennsylvania does not need another temporary rebate.

​

Pennsylvania needs serious property-tax reform that reduces the burden, protects essential services, controls spending, audits the system, and gives taxpayers enforceable rights.

​

This reform is built around one clear standard:

Cut the tax. Protect the home. Fund essential services. Stop the games. Hold government accountable.

​

What this plan will do

This reform plan will:

• reduce school property taxes by 50% within three years

• reduce county, municipal, and other covered local property taxes by at least 33% within five years

• give every taxable property a fair base reduction

• provide stronger protection for owner-occupied homes

• protect seniors, disabled homeowners, veterans, surviving spouses, and hardship households

• protect qualified family farms and working agricultural land

• protect renters through direct relief and pass-through accountability

• protect small businesses from hidden property-tax costs in rent and leases

• limit future property-tax increases

• require taxpayer approval for major new burdens

• stop government from replacing property taxes with hidden fees, authority charges, or substitute taxes

• create dedicated property-tax relief lockboxes

• protect essential services like schools, police, fire, EMS, roads, bridges, water, sewer, sanitation, and human services

• reform assessments and reassessments so relief is not erased on paper

• stop tax-sale abuse and protect surplus equity

• crack down on vacant, abandoned, unsafe, and neglected properties

• require large institutions, hospitals, universities, authorities, data centers, and large-load users to disclose their impact on local taxpayers

• audit schools, counties, municipalities, authorities, contractors, subsidies, assessments, tax sales, and public benefits

• require clawbacks when public money or tax benefits are abused

• create one statewide public dashboard

• pursue constitutional protections where needed

• keep the long-term goal of further reducing or eliminating remaining property taxes on owner-occupied homes and family farms when sustainable

 

1. Cut school property taxes by 50% within three years

School property taxes are one of the biggest drivers of property-tax pressure in Pennsylvania.

​

This plan would reduce school property taxes by:

• 20% in Year 1

• 35% in Year 2

• 50% in Year 3 and every year after

 

This would be measured against a certified baseline so the reduction is real.

​

Government should not be able to claim relief while quietly changing the math.

​

Every taxpayer should be able to see what they paid before reform, what the reduction should be, what relief they received, what they still owe, and how to challenge an error.

​

This is not a vague promise.

​

It is a measurable target.

​

2. Cut county and municipal property taxes by at least 33% within five years

Property taxes are not only school taxes.

​

Counties, municipalities, libraries, fire services, EMS systems, special districts, and other local entities also rely on property taxes.

​

This plan would reduce covered local property taxes by at least:

• 7% in Year 1

• 14% in Year 2

• 21% in Year 3

• 28% in Year 4

• 33% in Year 5 and every year after

 

The goal is not to destroy local services.

​

The goal is to reduce the burden while forcing government to budget honestly, cut waste, share services where practical, audit spending, and protect essential services instead of protecting bureaucracy.

​

3. Protect homeowners, seniors, veterans, disabled residents, and hardship households

A home is not just an asset.

​

It is where families live, where children grow up, and where seniors age.

​

Under this plan, an owner-occupied primary residence could not be forced into tax sale solely because the owner has a genuine inability to pay.

​

Before that could happen, the system would require:

• notice

• hardship review

• payment-plan options

• deferral options

• rebate or credit review

• appeal rights

• administrative review

• judicial review where appropriate

• surplus equity protection

 

This protection would not cover fraud, abandonment, fake homestead claims, willful refusal to pay by someone who can pay, or deliberate evasion.

​

But genuine hardship should not cost someone their home.

​

Seniors, disabled homeowners, veterans, surviving spouses, and families facing serious hardship would receive stronger protections through enhanced relief, freezes where appropriate, deferrals, payment plans, circuit-breaker relief, and easier application processes.

​

No one should lose their home because the paperwork was too complicated to navigate.

​

4. Protect family farms and working agricultural land

Family farms are homes, businesses, food production, heritage, and part of Pennsylvania’s economy.

​

This reform would protect qualified family farms, farmsteads, working agricultural land, and necessary farm structures from being taxed based on speculative development value.

​

If land is being genuinely farmed, it should be assessed based on agricultural use, not what a developer might someday pay for it.

​

Protected farm property could include the farmhouse, working fields, barns, silos, dairy facilities, livestock facilities, greenhouses, equipment sheds, irrigation systems, farm roads, and production-related buildings.

​

If land is later converted to non-farm development, rollback rules could apply.

​

The goal is simple:

Protect real farms.

Do not create loopholes for fake farming or land speculation.

​

5. Protect renters and small businesses

Renters pay property taxes too.

​

They just pay them through rent.

​

A property-tax reform that ignores renters is incomplete.

​

This plan would provide renter protections through direct renter relief where appropriate, stronger rebate programs, landlord disclosure when major public relief is received, protections against false tax-based rent increases, anti-retaliation rules, and complaint processes.

​

Small businesses also need protection.

​

Many small businesses do not own the building they operate from. They pay property taxes through triple-net leases, commercial rent, common-area charges, tax escalators, and lease add-ons.

​

Small-business tenants should be able to see whether the property owner received tax relief and whether the tax charges being passed through are accurate.

​

A small business should not pay a fake tax increase after the property owner received real tax relief.

​

6. Control spending before replacing revenue

Property-tax reform must be responsible.

​

But responsible does not mean surrendering before starting.

​

Before Pennsylvania asks families to pay more somewhere else, government must first review:

• waste

• fraud

• abuse

• inflated contracts

• administrative duplication

• unnecessary buildings

• procurement failures

• debt refinancing

• consolidation

• shared services

• grant misuse

• subsidy abuse

• loopholes

• collection failures

• underperforming programs

• authority spending

• school administrative costs

 

Replacement revenue should begin with discipline.

​

Not with another automatic burden on working families.

​

7. Create relief lockboxes and stop hidden tax shifts

If money is dedicated to property-tax relief, it should stay dedicated to property-tax relief.

​

This plan would create protected lockboxes for school property-tax relief, county and municipal relief, homeowner and hardship relief, family farm relief, renter and small-business relief, transition support, stabilization, taxpayer recovery, and clawbacks.

​

These funds should not be raided for unrelated spending.

​

This plan would also stop government from cutting one tax and quietly replacing it with another burden under a different name.

​

Local governments and public entities could not defeat relief through inflated fees, authority charges, special assessments, substitute taxes, reassessment games, debt gimmicks, fund transfers, artificial emergencies, or off-book obligations.

​

The test is simple:

Did taxpayers actually receive net relief?

If not, government should not get to call it reform.

​

8. Limit future tax increases and require taxpayer approval

A one-time reduction is not enough if government can simply raise the tax back up.

After the required reductions, future property-tax growth would be limited.

​

The general cap would be tied to the lesser of inflation, median household income growth, or a statutory cap, with a default no higher than 2%.

​

Above-cap increases would require strong justification, public disclosure, fiscal review, and taxpayer approval where required.

​

Taxpayers should also have a direct voice before government imposes major new property-tax burdens, substitute local taxes, major property-tax-backed debt, or authority-backed charges that operate like taxes.

​

There would be narrow emergency exceptions for real emergencies.

​

But emergency exceptions should not become a permanent loophole.

​

9. Protect schools and essential local services

This plan reduces property taxes while still protecting essential services.

​

For schools, that means protecting classroom instruction, special education, student transportation, school safety, vo-tech, career training, and required student services.

​

It does not mean protecting bloated administration, wasteful contracts, unnecessary buildings, bad procurement, or financial mismanagement.

​

For local governments, this plan protects police, fire, EMS, dispatch, emergency management, courts, roads, bridges, water, sewer, sanitation, stormwater, public health, human services, and lawful debt obligations.

​

But essential services are not the same as bureaucracy.

​

Before local entities receive hardship aid, emergency exceptions, or stabilization support, they must show they reviewed nonessential spending and took corrective action.

​

Taxpayers should not be threatened with service cuts while waste remains protected.

​

10. Reform assessments, appeals, tax sales, and surplus equity

Property-tax relief can be erased if government simply raises assessed values.

​

That is why this plan includes statewide assessment and reassessment protections.

​

Reassessments would have to be fair, transparent, revenue-neutral where required, appealable, publicly explained, and subject to audit.

​

Taxpayers would receive plain-language notices showing the old value, new value, millage, relief amount, bill before reform, bill after reform, and appeal rights.

​

This plan would also protect homeowners from being punished for ordinary repairs like roof repair, plumbing repair, electrical repair, heating repair, accessibility upgrades, safety repairs, weatherization, and code-compliance work.

Tax sale should be a last resort, not a business model.

​

Before an owner-occupied home, family farm, or good-faith small business can be sold for taxes, there should be strong notice, hardship review, payment-plan review, deferral review where applicable, appeal rights, and proof of reasonable contact.

​

And if a property is sold, surplus equity belongs to the owner.

​

Government should not keep more than it is legally owed.

​

11. Crack down on blight, speculation, and negligent landlords

This reform protects hardship.

​

It does not protect neglect.

​

Pennsylvania communities are being hurt by vacant, abandoned, unsafe, deteriorating, and blighted properties.

​

Good-faith hardship owners would receive help and reasonable time to fix problems.

​

Speculators, negligent landlords, land banks, shell owners, and absentee owners who allow properties to rot would face stronger enforcement.

​

Long-vacant usable properties would have to move toward productive use.

​

Owners could rent, sell, repair, occupy, lease to a qualified tenant, enter a housing or small-business program, transfer to a responsible owner, redevelop, or demolish if unsafe.

​

This is not a blanket forced below-market rent policy.

​

But if an owner accepts public benefits, tax relief, subsidies, grants, abatements, or vacancy-fee waivers, the public can require a public benefit in return.

​

Public money should not subsidize slumlords, land speculators, or empty buildings that damage neighborhoods.

​

12. Hold large institutions, data centers, and special deals accountable

Many communities have large amounts of tax-exempt property.

​

Churches, small charities, food banks, shelters, youth organizations, veterans groups, and volunteer organizations should not be treated like large commercial institutions.

​

But large nonprofit hospitals, health systems, universities, colleges, authorities, and major institutional landholders can create real local service costs.

​

This plan would require transparency around exempt property, land holdings, public subsidies, commercial activity, service impacts, community benefits, PILOT agreements, related entities, and land banking.

​

Data centers and large-load users would also be required to account for their full impact on electric grids, water systems, sewer systems, roads, emergency services, local infrastructure, utility rates, housing markets, and taxpayers.

​

No data center should receive special tax treatment while local families, small businesses, and ratepayers carry the burden.

​

Pennsylvania should also stop handing out special deals without measurable results.

​

Every subsidy, abatement, tax credit, grant, KOZ-style benefit, TIF-style deal, public land transfer, or infrastructure subsidy should answer basic questions:

• How much does it cost?

• Who benefits?

• What jobs are created?

• What investment is guaranteed?

• What happens if promises are broken?

• Is there a clawback?

• Is the public better off?

 

No company should receive public benefit without public accountability.

​

13. Audit the system and create one public dashboard

Property-tax reform will fail if nobody tracks the money.

​

This plan would require audits of schools, counties, municipalities, authorities, contractors, vendors, reassessment firms, collection agencies, tax-sale systems, grants, subsidies, PILOT agreements, data-center agreements, landlord relief, renter relief, farmstead relief, vacant-property programs, replacement revenue, and lockboxes.

​

Audits could be financial, performance-based, forensic, program-specific, contract-based, or random spot audits.

​

The plan would also protect whistleblowers who report fraud, waste, abuse, retaliation, contract manipulation, false claims, or local-government circumvention.

​

Pennsylvania needs one public place where taxpayers can see what is happening.

​

The statewide property-tax dashboard would show property-tax reduction progress, replacement revenue, lockbox balances, audits, clawbacks, penalties, appeals, assessment data, taxpayer savings, tax-sale activity, surplus equity returns, vacant-property enforcement, renter relief, small-business relief, farm relief, major contracts, major subsidies, institutional agreements, data-center impact reporting, local-government compliance, fraud recovery, and spending controls.

​

Protected personal information would not be exposed.

​

But government should not be able to hide behind confusing reports and scattered records.

​

14. Build a responsible transition and pursue constitutional protections

This reform would be phased in with firm targets and transition safeguards.

​

Pennsylvania would create a Property Tax Relief Stabilization Reserve to prevent fiscal shocks, protect essential services, handle temporary shortfalls, support distressed communities where justified, and issue corrective credits or rebates where needed.

​

It could not be used for unrelated spending, patronage, political projects, nonessential programs, or bailouts for fraud and mismanagement.

​

If replacement revenue underperforms, local property taxes should not automatically rise.

​

The state would first verify the shortfall, review collection performance, investigate waste and fraud, use stabilization reserves where appropriate, restrict nonessential spending, enforce clawbacks, review replacement-revenue performance, use temporary state backfill where needed, and require corrective plans.

​

If replacement revenue overperforms, the extra money should be used to stabilize the system, deepen property-tax relief, reduce debt, issue taxpayer credits or rebates, strengthen lockboxes, and support essential services tied to the reform.

​

Statutory reform should begin immediately.

​

Where needed, Pennsylvania should pursue constitutional protections for core relief targets, lockboxes, anti-diversion rules, taxpayer approval requirements, levy limits, owner-occupied home protections, surplus equity protections, and anti-circumvention rules.

​

Constitutional amendments should strengthen relief.

​

They should not delay statutory action that can begin now.

​

What this means for Pennsylvania

For homeowners, this means lower property-tax bills, stronger homestead protection, clearer tax bills, better appeal rights, protection from reassessment games, protection from hidden tax shifts, and protection from tax-sale abuse.

​

For seniors, it means stronger protection from being taxed out of their homes.

​

For family farms, it means agricultural-use assessment protection, farmstead relief, hardship protections, and long-term priority for deeper relief.

​

For renters, it means direct relief where appropriate, stronger rebate programs, protection from fake tax-based rent increases, and accountability for landlords receiving major public relief.

​

For small businesses, it means protection from inaccurate tax pass-through charges, commercial lease transparency, relief for owner-occupied small businesses, and stronger appeal rights.

​

For schools and local governments, it means stable funding, essential-service protection, transition support where justified, stronger fiscal oversight, procurement accountability, and public reporting.

​

For taxpayers, it means measurable relief, enforceable rights, clear tax bills, public dashboards, spending controls, audit trails, clawbacks, appeal rights, and taxpayer approval for major new burdens.

​

Bottom line

Pennsylvania does not need another temporary rebate that disappears when the next tax bill arrives.

​

Pennsylvania needs a fairer, lower, more transparent, and more accountable property-tax system.

​

This plan cuts school property taxes by 50% within three years.

​

It cuts county, municipal, and other covered local property taxes by at least 33% within five years.

​

It protects homeowners, seniors, veterans, disabled residents, renters, family farms, and small businesses.

​

It protects essential services while forcing government to control spending.

​

It stops hidden tax shifts, reassessment games, tax-sale abuse, lockbox raids, and political special deals.

​

It keeps the long-term goal of deeper relief and possible elimination for owner-occupied homes and family farms when sustainable.

​

The standard is clear:

Keep people in their homes. Protect family farms. Cut the burden. Stop the games. Hold government accountable.